In the original suit, Texas referred to evidence by a Dr. Cicchetti who pointed out the statistical improbabilities of Biden pulling far ahead in all four swing states late on election night, given that Trump was leading with a plurality of votes – if not the majority – already counted.

“Pennsylvania’s rebuttal to Dr. Cicchetti’s analysis consists solely of ad hominem attacks, calling it “nonsense” and “worthless,” Texas responded. “Notably, a subsequent analysis by Dr. Cicchetti, comparing Mr. Biden’s underperformance in the Top-50 urban areas in the Country relative to former Secretary Clinton’s performance in the 2016 election, reinforces the unusual statistical improbability of Mr. Biden’s vote totals in the five urban areas in the Defendant States.”



Read more…